AV1 and HEVC are leading video codecs in 2024, each with unique strengths:
AV1: Better compression, higher quality, royalty-free
HEVC: Faster encoding, wider device support, complex licensing
Quick comparison:
Feature | AV1 | HEVC |
---|---|---|
Compression | Up to 50% better than H.264 | 25-50% better than H.264 |
Quality | Better at lower bitrates | Good, less efficient than AV1 |
Encoding Speed | 3x slower than HEVC | Faster |
Hardware Support | Limited, growing | Widespread |
Licensing | Free | Paid, complex |
Best For | Future-proofing, bandwidth savings | Wide compatibility now |
Choose AV1 for:
Future-proofing content
Bandwidth savings
Avoiding licensing fees
Stick with HEVC for:
Wide device compatibility
Fast encoding (live streaming)
Immediate broad support
Many companies use both. Your specific needs will determine the best choice for your video streaming in 2024.
Related video from YouTube
How They Work
Let's break down AV1 and HEVC to see what makes these video codecs tick in 2024.
Basic Structure
AV1 and HEVC share similar building blocks, but AV1 takes it up a notch:
Feature | AV1 | HEVC |
---|---|---|
Coding Units | Bigger sizes | Regular sizes |
Prediction | Fancy intra and inter | Old-school methods |
Transform Coding | New tools | Standard stuff |
AV1's bigger coding units? They're great for squeezing down high-res content. That's why it's a champ in the 4K and 8K world.
How They Compress Video
Both codecs use smart tricks to shrink video files:
They turn pixel data into frequencies
They cut down on repeated info in the bitstream
They guess what's in new frames based on old ones
But AV1? It's got extra tricks up its sleeve:
It splits video into tiles for faster processing
It tweaks compression based on what's in the video
These extras are why AV1 is so darn efficient. Here's what Thierry Fautier from Harmonic says:
Setup Methods
Setting up these codecs isn't easy:
Aspect | AV1 | HEVC |
---|---|---|
Encoding Time | Takes about 3x longer | Faster than AV1 |
Hardware Support | Not much, but growing | Everywhere |
Software Support | Top-notch | Good, but watch out for licenses |
AV1 takes longer to encode, but it's worth it for the efficiency. Netflix, who jumped on AV1 early, said in 2023 they've cut encoding time by 55%. That's huge for using it on a big scale.
Tech Specs Side by Side
Here's the nitty-gritty:
Feature | AV1 | HEVC |
---|---|---|
Max Resolution | 8K and beyond | 8K |
Bitrate Savings vs H.264 | Up to 50% | 25-50% |
Royalties | None | It's complicated |
Best Use Case | Future-proofing | Works great right now |
AV1 being royalty-free? That's music to the ears of big tech companies. Google and Amazon have been pushing for it since 2018.
In the real world, AV1 shows its stuff. A 2023 study found that for 4K Ultra HD, AV1 beat HEVC by a whopping 43.90% in squeezing down file sizes.
Choosing between AV1 and HEVC in 2024? It's about balancing tomorrow's tech with today's compatibility. HEVC works on more devices now, but AV1's efficiency is hard to ignore, especially for big streaming companies looking at the future of video.
Speed and Quality Tests
Let's compare AV1 and HEVC in real-world tests.
File Size Reduction
AV1 beats HEVC in shrinking video files:
Codec | Compression Efficiency |
---|---|
AV1 | Up to 50% vs H.264 |
HEVC | 25-50% vs H.264 |
For 4K Ultra HD, AV1 outperforms HEVC by 43.90% in file size reduction.
Processing Time
HEVC is faster:
Codec | Encoding Time | Decoding Time |
---|---|---|
AV1 | 445.799 sec | 2.865 sec |
HEVC | 2.83 sec | 1.74 sec |
AV1 takes 3x longer to encode. But there's good news: AOM-AV1 3.5 has cut encoding time by 34%.
Video Quality Results
AV1 wins in visual quality:
It delivers better image quality at the same Constant Rate Factor (CRF).
AV1 at CRF=27 matches HEVC at CRF=21, meaning better quality at higher compression.
Performance Numbers
Here's a quick breakdown:
Metric | AV1 | HEVC |
---|---|---|
Bitrate Savings | 30% better than HEVC | Baseline |
Quality at Same Size | Higher | Good, but lower |
Encoding Speed | Very slow | Faster than AV1 |
Hardware Support | Limited, growing | Widely available |
AV1's slow encoding is a downside, but its efficiency is hard to ignore. Netflix and YouTube think it's worth it for high-quality content at lower bitrates.
In the real world, these differences matter. Facebook has seen a 50% bitrate reduction using AV1 compared to HEVC for video content.
As AV1 hardware support grows and encoding speeds up, we'll likely see more adoption. For now, choosing between AV1 and HEVC depends on balancing quality, file size, and processing time for your specific needs.
Where They're Used
AV1 and HEVC are duking it out in the video codec world in 2024. Let's see how they stack up in real life.
Streaming Services
Big streaming platforms are picking sides:
Platform | AV1 | HEVC |
---|---|---|
Netflix | ✅ | ✅ |
YouTube | ✅ | ✅ |
Amazon Prime Video | ❌ | ✅ |
Apple TV+ | ❌ | ✅ |
Disney+ | ❌ | ✅ |
Netflix is going all-in on AV1. They started streaming AV1 on Android in 2020 and expanded to smart TVs and game consoles by 2023. Netflix's Mark Watson says:
YouTube's not far behind, using AV1 for 8K videos on fancy TVs since 2020.
Device Support
AV1's the new guy, while HEVC's been around the block:
Device Type | AV1 Support | HEVC Support |
---|---|---|
Smartphones | 9.76% (2024 Q2) | Over 95% |
Smart TVs | Growing | Everywhere |
Streaming Devices | Not much | Everywhere |
Gaming Consoles | Not much | Everywhere |
The iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max gave AV1 a boost, doubling its adoption to 9.76% in Q2 2024. But HEVC's still king, with almost every new phone on board.
AV1 Support Chart
Here's who's playing nice with AV1:
Platform/Device | AV1 Support Status |
---|---|
Chrome | ✅ Full |
Firefox | ✅ Full |
Safari | ✅ With hardware decoder |
Android | ✅ Full (Android 12+) |
iOS | ✅ With hardware decoder (iPhone 15 Pro+) |
Samsung TVs | ✅ Full (late 2020 models+) |
Amazon Fire TV | ✅ Full |
PlayStation 4 Pro | ✅ Supported |
Roku Streaming Stick 4K | ❌ Not officially supported |
HEVC's still more popular, but the tide's turning. Big tech names like Apple, Google, and Microsoft are backing AV1, pushing for more adoption.
Netflix's seeing some sweet results with AV1:
2% less waiting for videos to start
Up to 38% fewer annoying quality drops
These perks are making AV1 look pretty good, especially for high-quality video that doesn't hog bandwidth.
Price and License Fees
Let's talk money. The cost of video codecs can make a huge difference in how widely they're used. Here's the scoop on AV1 and HEVC:
License Fees
AV1 and HEVC are worlds apart when it comes to licensing:
Codec | License Fees | Notes |
---|---|---|
AV1 | Royalty-free | Patent cross-licensing included |
HEVC | Paid | Multiple patent pools, it's complicated |
AV1 is the big tech favorite. It's royalty-free, but there's a catch. You have to agree to license your own patents back to the Alliance of Open Media (AOM) for free. This applies to AV1 and future AOM codecs.
HEVC? It's a different story. It's got a traditional licensing setup, but it's messy. There are multiple patent pools like MPEG LA, HEVC Advance, and Velos Media. This has given many companies a headache when trying to use HEVC.
Setup Costs
Getting started with each codec comes with its own price tag:
Codec | Initial Setup Costs | Ongoing Costs |
---|---|---|
AV1 | Development time | Not much |
HEVC | Licensing fees + Development | Yearly royalties |
For AV1, you're mainly paying with time. Netflix, for example, put a lot of work into making AV1 encoding faster. By 2023, they cut encoding time by 55%.
HEVC setup? You're dealing with licensing talks AND development. The exact cost? It depends on what you're doing and how big you are.
Cost Breakdown
Let's look at the numbers for HEVC, according to HEVC Advance:
Devices: $0.20 each after the first 100,000 units per year
Enterprise Cap: Now $40 million a year, down from $45 million
Content Distribution: No charge for streaming, cable, broadcast, or satellite
HEVC Advance has made some big changes to get more people on board. They've dropped fees for non-physical content distribution, which is great news for streaming services.
This quote shows how codec licensing is changing. HEVC is widely used, but people are worried about future fees.
AV1, backed by big names like Google, Amazon, and Netflix, looks pretty good. Being royalty-free could mean cheaper streaming video and less environmental impact.
But remember, "royalty-free" doesn't mean risk-free. Companies outside of AOM might have patents that cover parts of AV1, which could cause problems down the road.
In 2024, choosing between AV1 and HEVC isn't just about tech. It's about navigating a maze of licenses, patents, and potential future costs. As more companies lean towards royalty-free options, we'll likely see them weighing the long-term benefits of AV1 against the established, but pricey, HEVC ecosystem.
sbb-itb-f396625
Switching Between Codecs
Switching video codecs isn't just a tech upgrade - it's a game-changer for your entire video workflow. Let's break down how to switch between codecs like AV1 and HEVC without losing your mind (or your viewers).
Common Problems
Switching codecs can be a pain. Here's what you might run into:
Problem | What It Means | Why It Matters |
---|---|---|
Device Headaches | Old devices might not play nice with new codecs | You could lose viewers |
Quality Dips | Bad transcoding can make your videos look awful | Viewers might bail |
Slowdowns | Live transcoding can make your stream laggy | Viewers get annoyed, especially during live events |
Storage Bloat | Keeping multiple versions eats up space | Your wallet takes a hit |
Netflix tackled these issues head-on with AV1. By 2023, they slashed encoding time by 55%. Not too shabby for a company streaming to millions.
How to Make the Switch
Ready to switch? Here's how to do it without breaking everything:
1. Know Your Why
Figure out what you're after. Better compression? More devices? Get clear on your goals.
2. Pick Your Tools
Choose a transcoding solution that fits your size:
Big operation? Try cloud services like AWS Elemental MediaConvert.
Got your own hardware? Use on-premises encoders.
Small-time? Software like FFmpeg might do the trick.
3. Get Your Videos in Order
Sort out which videos to switch first. Don't try to boil the ocean.
4. Set Up Your Assembly Line
Create a system that can handle your video volume without crashing.
5. Test, Tweak, Repeat
Start small, check the results, and fine-tune as you go.
YouTube didn't rush it. They rolled out AV1 bit by bit, focusing on the viral hits first. By late 2021, they aimed for 10-20% of videos in AV1. Smart move.
Your Pre-Switch Checklist
Before you hit the big red button:
[ ] Make sure your target devices can handle the new codec
[ ] Figure out which videos will benefit most
[ ] Check if your systems can take the encoding heat
[ ] Set up a way to compare old and new versions
[ ] Plan a gradual rollout, starting with the B-team content
[ ] Keep the old codec around for devices stuck in the past
[ ] Set up tools to watch how it's all going
Netflix nailed this approach. They started with AV1 on Android in early 2020, then spread out slowly. By late 2023, they'd switched over 30% of their massive library. That's how you do it.
This quote's a wake-up call. Staying ahead in the codec game isn't just smart - it might be necessary to keep your content flowing.
Streaming Performance
AV1 and HEVC each have their own strengths when it comes to streaming video. Let's look at how these codecs handle modern video delivery.
Bitrate Testing
AV1 and HEVC are both efficient with bitrates, but AV1 comes out on top:
Codec | Bitrate Savings vs H.264 | Quality at Lower Bitrates |
---|---|---|
AV1 | Up to 50% | Same quality at 55% bitrate |
HEVC | 25-50% | Same quality at 67% bitrate |
AV1 really shines with higher resolutions. For 8K content, it saves 63% on bitrate compared to H.264, while HEVC manages 53%.
Netflix, an early AV1 adopter, saw real benefits in 2023:
2% less waiting time for videos to start
Up to 38% fewer quality drops during playback
Quality Change Speed
HEVC currently adapts video quality on the fly better:
Feature | AV1 | HEVC |
---|---|---|
Encoding Speed | 3x slower than HEVC | Faster |
Hardware Support | Limited | Widespread |
Live Streaming Capability | Limited | Good |
HEVC's faster encoding makes it better for live streaming and quick quality changes. Hardware-accelerated HEVC encoding can be 5 times faster than software processing.
AV1 is improving, though. The latest AOM-AV1 (3.5) cut encoding time by 34% for 1080p videos on a 16-thread CPU.
Streaming Test Results
Real-world tests show AV1's potential, especially for video-on-demand:
Metric | AV1 | HEVC |
---|---|---|
Efficiency | 28% more efficient | Baseline |
Live Streaming Speed | 1.6x faster than x264 | Standard |
Bitrate Reduction | 48% (VMAF metric) | N/A |
For live streaming, AV1 cut bitrate by 48% while keeping quality, and was 1.6 times faster than x264 (a popular H.264 encoder).
In video calls on an iPhone 12, AV1 was 40-90% faster than older codecs, matched video quality, and saved 60% or more on bitrate.
But AV1 still has issues with real-time use:
Current software encoders run at about 0.032 frames per second
To encode in real-time at 24 fps, machines would need 746 times more computing power
This means H.264 or HEVC are still better for low-latency live streaming.
As hardware support grows and encoding speeds get better, AV1 will likely improve in streaming performance across all uses.
How to Choose
Picking between AV1 and HEVC in 2024 isn't just about tech specs. It's about finding the right fit for your needs. Let's break it down.
What to Consider
When choosing between AV1 and HEVC, keep these factors in mind:
Factor | AV1 | HEVC |
---|---|---|
Video Quality | Better at lower bitrates | Good, but less efficient than AV1 |
Compression | Up to 50% better than H.264 | 25-50% better than H.264 |
Encoding Speed | Slower (3x slower than HEVC) | Faster |
Hardware Support | Limited, but growing | Widespread |
Licensing | Royalty-free | Complex, paid licensing |
Best For | Future-proofing, bandwidth savings | Current wide compatibility |
AV1 wins in quality and compression. Netflix saw a 2% drop in video start times and up to 38% fewer quality drops with AV1 in 2023. But HEVC's faster encoding makes it better for live streaming now.
Choice Guide
Here's a quick guide to help you decide:
Pick AV1 if you want to future-proof your content, save bandwidth, and avoid licensing fees. But be ready for slower encoding times.
Facebook's switch to AV1 in 2023 cut bitrates by 50% compared to HEVC for video content. That's a big deal for a platform with billions of users.
Stick with HEVC if you need wide device compatibility now, fast encoding (like for live streaming), and don't mind licensing costs.
Apple's use of HEVC for iOS devices shows it's still going strong. Many major streaming platforms rely on it.
Consider your audience:
For mobile users, HEVC might be better. It's on over 95% of smartphones, while AV1 was only on 9.76% in Q2 2024.
For 4K and 8K content, AV1 is tough to beat. YouTube uses it for 8K videos on high-end TVs.
It's not always an either-or choice. Netflix uses both. They started with AV1 on Android in 2020 and grew from there, while keeping HEVC for broader compatibility.
The bottom line? If you're into cutting-edge tech and can handle some growing pains, go for AV1. If you need something reliable and widely supported right now, HEVC is still solid. Your specific needs will point the way.
Summary
Let's break down AV1 and HEVC to help you pick the right codec for your 2024 needs:
Feature | AV1 | HEVC |
---|---|---|
Compression | Up to 50% better than H.264 | 25-50% better than H.264 |
Video Quality | Better at lower bitrates | Good, but less efficient |
Encoding Speed | Slower (3x slower than HEVC) | Faster |
Hardware Support | Limited, but growing | Widespread |
Licensing | Royalty-free | Paid, complex |
Best For | Future-proofing, saving bandwidth | Wide compatibility now |
AV1 is a compression powerhouse. It's perfect for companies looking ahead and wanting to save on bandwidth. Netflix's 2023 AV1 results speak for themselves:
That's a big win for viewer experience and potentially lower streaming costs.
HEVC? It's still in the game with faster encoding and broad hardware support. It's your go-to for live streaming and quick encoding needs.
So, AV1 or HEVC? Here's what to think about:
1. Bandwidth and Storage
Want to slash bandwidth use? AV1's your guy. Facebook switched to AV1 in 2023 and cut their bitrate in HALF compared to HEVC. That's huge for a platform with billions of users.
2. Device Compatibility
HEVC's still king here. It's on 95% of smartphones, while AV1 was only on 9.76% in Q2 2024. Need to reach everyone right now? HEVC might be safer.
3. Content Type
Got 4K or 8K content? AV1 shines here. YouTube uses it for 8K videos on fancy TVs. If you're all about that premium, high-quality content, AV1 could give you an edge.
4. Encoding Resources
Short on encoding power or time? HEVC's your friend. It's about 3 times faster than AV1, which matters for live events or tight deadlines.
5. Cost
AV1's royalty-free status is a big deal for companies pushing tons of video. HEVC's licensing can be a real headache, especially for smaller outfits.
But hey, it's not always one or the other. Big players like Netflix use both. They started with AV1 on Android in 2020 and grew from there, while keeping HEVC for wider reach.
Looking ahead, AV1's probably going to grow, with Google, Amazon, and Netflix backing it. But HEVC's not going anywhere soon.
FAQs
Is AV1 better than HEVC?
Short answer: Yes.
AV1 beats HEVC in both compression efficiency and video quality. Here's the breakdown:
Resolution | AV1 vs HEVC Performance |
---|---|
UHD 2160P | 43.90% better |
720p | 37.81% better |
Overall | 30% better compression |
Big names like Netflix and YouTube are jumping on the AV1 bandwagon. Why? Netflix's 2023 switch to AV1 showed:
2% faster video start times
Up to 38% fewer quality drops during playback
Is HEVC better quality than AV1?
Nope. AV1 takes the crown here too.
Aspect | AV1 | HEVC |
---|---|---|
Compression Efficiency | Wins | Loses |
Video Quality at Same Bitrate | Better | Not as good |
File Size for Same Quality | Smaller | Bigger |
AV1 delivers the same eye candy as HEVC but uses about 30% less data. That's music to the ears of streaming services and data-conscious mobile users.
What's the bitrate showdown: H.265 vs AV1?
AV1 needs less bitrate than H.265 (HEVC) for the same quality:
Codec | Bitrate Savings vs H.264 |
---|---|
AV1 | Up to 50% |
HEVC (H.265) | 25-50% |
But here's the catch: AV1 is slower to encode:
H.265/HEVC encoding is 2x faster than AV1
At 1 Mbps (UHD), H.266/VVC takes 27x longer than AV1
At 15 Mbps (FHD), H.266/VVC takes a whopping 174x longer than AV1
So, while AV1 compresses better, it needs more processing muscle and time to get the job done.